feat(skills,studio,media-use): the intent layer, review loop, and user memory — BRIEF.md, companion mode, recipes; /website-to-video folds into /product-launch-video (#2133)

* feat(studio,cli): per-frame board comments, self-refreshing storyboard, status-aware preview landing

Per-frame comment boxes on the storyboard board batch into
.hyperframes/frame-comments.json (a resubmit wins per frame; unconsumed
comments on other frames are kept). Submitted-but-unconsumed comments
stay visible — a toolbar banner plus a per-tile echo — until the agent
consumes the file; the banner also says what to do next (reply anything
in the agent chat).

The board keeps itself current: GET /projects/:id/signature exposes the
watcher-cached project signature, the storyboard payload carries the
signature it was derived from, and the view polls at 2s (hidden tabs
skipped, re-checked on visibility), refetching in place with no loading
flash. Posters bake the signature into their URL so tiles fill in as
sketches land and a poster that failed mid-write retries on the next
version; the empty state upgrades itself when STORYBOARD.md appears,
and its handoff prompt now points the agent at the review loop and uses
the parser's real status vocabulary (outline, not planned).

preview lands the browser on the storyboard view while the board is the
review surface — any frame built, or pure planning (srcs declared, none
on disk yet) — and on the timeline once the video is assembled.

* feat(skills): the review loop — plan, sketch, build as one shared process

hyperframes-core/references/review-loop.md is the single source for the
three-pass collaborative review: the plan proposed on a live board
(§ 1), wireframe sketches marked built with one layout question (§ 2 —
real words on plain blocks, run no CLI; a confirmed board is itself a
valid deliverable when the user asked for a storyboard, not a video),
the build dressing confirmed layouts (§ 3, worker or inline), and the
final look (§ 4). Autonomous runs skip every gate and keep one question
before render.

The three narrative workflows' Steps 3/4/6 collapse to references plus
their sketch stand-ins (captured-asset blocks for product-launch-video,
plain code panels for pr-to-video); the confirmed-sketch handoff stays
in each frame-worker prompt. general-video plans on a board for
multi-scene narrative pieces in collaborative mode — its sketch pass is
layout-before-animation with the user watching. The router treats
"I want a storyboard" as a process request rather than a route, and
closes exploratory intake by recommending a route plus how the run will
review.

The supporting contracts land next door: the comments channel (silent
submit, one reply picks it up, check the file before the words) in
brief-contract § 1; the sidecar schema and the built status rung in
storyboard-format; the mode question asked first and alone in the three
workflows' Step 0.

* feat(media-use): user memory — remembered preferences and frozen recipes

Two tiers of memory on media-use's existing two-tier storage split.

Preferences (lightweight): confirmed brief answers — destination, aspect,
language, mode, voice, style preset — recorded to the project's
.media/preferences.json (committed, the team inherits it) and promoted
to the personal ~/.media/preferences.json once the same value is
confirmed in two different projects (a sightings ledger accumulates the
cross-project evidence user-side, since project files can't see each
other). prefs.mjs get/record; merge reads project-over-user; a changed
value restarts its provenance.

Recipes (heavyweight): one approved run frozen as a named, versioned
bundle — frame.md, the storyboard skeleton (structure kept: durations,
transitions, srcs, Video direction; statuses reset to outline; content
blanked to per-frame fill-ins naming the beat's role), and the confirmed
brief values. Named folders, not content hashes: re-freezing bumps
version and archives <name>@v<N>; a freeze is already confirmed, so it
promotes to the user tier immediately. recipe.mjs freeze/list/use, plus
resolve --type recipe --entity <name> delegating like grade/lut.

16 new node --test cases; the media-use lib suite is 168/168.

* feat(skills): wire user memory into the brief and the review loop

brief-contract § 2 gains Remembered defaults: read the merged
preferences before Round 2 and let a remembered value become the
recommended option with a receipt naming its source project. Memory
changes the default, never the question — every ask-marked field still
gets asked, and what the request says this time beats what was picked
last time. Record only what the user actually confirmed (a defaulted
voice nobody chose is not an answer; a "go" that accepts the
recommended defaults is). The first record announces itself once;
after that the receipts carry the reminder. In autonomous mode a
remembered value becomes the decided value, receipt included.

The three narrative workflows read the remembered defaults before
Round 2, record the confirmed answers at the Step 0 gate, record the
chosen preset at the Step 2 gate (pr-to-video excepted — its preset is
fixed), and fall back to the remembered voice when the request names
none. general-video's discovery reads the same defaults.

Recipes wire in at both ends: Step 0 checks for a matching recipe
before the mode question — one question, plural-aware, and adopting
one fills the brief, skips the design step, and drafts the storyboard
from the frozen skeleton while every review gate still runs. The
review loop's final look (§ 4) offers the freeze once after approval,
and the confirmation teaches the recall phrase — the name is something
the system reminds the user of, never something they must remember.
The router recognizes a named recipe or "like last time" as a route.

* docs(skills): the sketch pass names check, not the deprecated validate

* feat(skills): intent-layer references — process, route briefs, capability menu, BRIEF.md format

* feat(media-use): brief skeleton as the recipe's fourth artifact; flow/storyboard preference keys

* feat(skills): the intent layer conducts every brief — workflows execute BRIEF.md

* feat(skills): retire the mode preference key; sync catalog surfaces for intent layer

* refactor(skills): dedupe router vs intent-layer guidance — one owner per rule

* feat(skills): the design ask — own spec, pick by eye from showcases, or defer

* docs(skills): the design ask says the honest line on capture routes

* feat(skills): product-launch-video absorbs website-to-video as the tour angle

* refactor(skills): keep product-launch-video pristine — a tour is brief intent, not a pipeline branch

* feat(skills): production loop + genre lenses; general-video goes freeform (route yours, laws hold)

* refactor(skills): /hyperframes is the front door - route tables and scope lists leave the workflows

* docs(skills): review-loop pass across skill catalog

* fix(cli): pass project dir to openStudioBrowser in background-server path

* feat(skills): add pitch-round reference - verbalized sampling concept gate

* feat(skills): wire pitch round into intent layer - completeness triage + route eligibility

* feat(skills): editorial capability recommendations, handoff disciplines, menu-probe split

* feat(skills): pitches carry their machinery; source-only-formed requests pitch the telling

* feat(skills): companion goes director - ceiling treatment plus blueprint/rule citation discipline

* fix(scripts): sandbox npx-leak guard - private npm global prefix keeps npx on the branch CLI

* chore(skills): resync manifest hash after formatter pass reflowed general-video tables

* fix(skills): recipe freeze reads workflow from BRIEF.md; style_preset records require workflow scope

Two holes found by a live companion-run freeze: the agent-supplied --workflow
contradicted the run's actual workflow (recipe.json said faceless-explainer,
brief-skeleton said general-video), and the style_preset lookup missed because
the preference had been recorded under the bare key.

- freezeRecipe resolves the workflow from BRIEF.md frontmatter; the flag is a
  fallback for briefless projects and a contradicting flag is ignored (noted).
- recordPreference refuses a bare style_preset — the scoped key is the only
  writable shape; freeze tolerates legacy bare records via read fallback.
- review-loop § 4 / media-use SKILL / brief-format wording follow the machinery.
This commit is contained in:
WaterrrForever
2026-07-15 21:19:14 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent ca69b6b080
commit b9be0b2625
143 changed files with 3831 additions and 5188 deletions
@@ -21,10 +21,14 @@
- `../references/cut-catalog.md` — the **cut catalog** (zoom-through / inverse / cut-the-curve / waterfall). When a Scene seam is a within-scene swap, a scene-to-scene cut, or a text-to-text line change, build it INSIDE your composition per this catalog (Z-scale + blur + opacity, or per-word x-staggers). You never author the between-frame transition — story's `transition_in` + the injector own that.
- Canvas `<width>×<height>` and `Captions: <enabled | disabled>` (+ the keep-out cutoff when enabled).
**Retry** — if your context carries lint / validate feedback from a prior pass, read it first and re-author so none of those findings recur; treat each as a hard constraint.
**Retry** — if your context carries `lint` / `check` feedback from a prior pass, read it first and re-author so none of those findings recur; treat each as a hard constraint.
**OUTPUT**`compositions/frames/<frame_id>.html`, one self-contained sub-composition. Writing it (past the self-check below) is your **terminal action** — you do not edit `STORYBOARD.md`, mint audio, assemble the index, run the CLI, or report back. The orchestrator picks up the file and marks the frame's `status`.
## When a confirmed sketch exists
In collaborative runs the orchestrator wireframes the board first, so your target file may already exist as the frame's **user-confirmed wireframe** — your dispatch says whether it does (a file found on a retry is your own prior output, not a sketch). Read it first and **keep its composition**: the placement, hierarchy, and copy were approved — don't move or drop them. Everything else is yours to finish: the full `frame.md` treatment (the sketch is deliberately unstyled), the finished invented visuals where the sketch used plain blocks, and the motion — map each Scene onto a timeline phase, reveal each piece on its `voiceover` cue with `fromTo` entrances, adding DOM only where a phase needs it. The frame's landed state must still read as the approved wireframe, fully dressed.
## You do NOT decide
These belong to other steps — touching them collides with a sibling or breaks an upstream contract:
@@ -50,14 +54,14 @@ Generic seek-safety + structure live in `hyperframes-core` (read it; not restate
## Workflow
1. **Read**`hyperframes-core`'s composition contract (the structural law), then `frame.md` (the look) and your `## Frame N` block (the shot sequence + `blueprint:` / `focal:` / `roles:`). **Then read the blueprint template** `../hyperframes-animation/blueprints/<id>.md` (skip if `compose`) for the shot's shape and signature move, and **open the rule recipe `RULES_DIR/<id>.md` for every named motion** in the Scene lines (plus the shared `../hyperframes-animation/examples/<id>.html` when the recipe is unclear): you reproduce these mechanics, not improvise them. Internalize the self-check codes below before you write — most lethal is **template transport**: every `<style>` + `<script>` (including the gsap load) must live INSIDE `<template>`, because the runtime only clones template contents and `lint` / `validate` / `inspect` can miss the resulting blank sub-composition.
1. **Read**`hyperframes-core`'s composition contract (the structural law), then `frame.md` (the look) and your `## Frame N` block (the shot sequence + `blueprint:` / `focal:` / `roles:`). **Then read the blueprint template** `../hyperframes-animation/blueprints/<id>.md` (skip if `compose`) for the shot's shape and signature move, and **open the rule recipe `RULES_DIR/<id>.md` for every named motion** in the Scene lines (plus the shared `../hyperframes-animation/examples/<id>.html` when the recipe is unclear): you reproduce these mechanics, not improvise them. Internalize the self-check codes below before you write — most lethal is **template transport**: every `<style>` + `<script>` (including the gsap load) must live INSIDE `<template>`, because the runtime only clones template contents and the assembled-project `lint` / `check` gate can miss an unwired blank sub-composition.
2. **Design** — turn the time-coded shot sequence into a timeline using `frame.md`'s components and type ramp: each Scene window becomes a phase revealed on its `voiceover` cue, each named motion built from the recipe you just read, the blueprint's signature move kept recognizable. Invent the visual elements the Scene lines describe (the diagram, the hero word, the metaphor), and find a visual idea that reinforces the beat, not a literal restyle of the words.
3. **Author** — write the full sub-composition to `compositions/frames/<frame_id>.html` (rewrite to iterate; last write wins). `<template>`-wrapped root carrying `data-composition-id="<frame_id>"` and styled via `#root` (not a class on that element — see the self-check below), exactly one `gsap.timeline({ paused: true })` registered at `window.__timelines["<frame_id>"]`, built synchronously — per the core contract.
4. **Self-check, then finish** — re-read your file against the checklist below and fix in place. Writing the file is your terminal action; you do **not** run the CLI.
## Self-check before finishing (you do NOT run the CLI)
You **can't** meaningfully run `hyperframes lint` / `validate` / `inspect` here: they operate on the **assembled project** (the `index.html` graph / bundle), and your frame isn't wired in yet — so they report on _other_ files, not yours (a false green). The **orchestrator** runs them at **Step 6, after assembly** (the correct unit), and **re-dispatches you with the finding** if your frame fails (see **Retry** above). So get it right on write: re-read your file against this checklist before finishing — the codes in parens are `hyperframes lint`'s and what the orchestrator may cite back (the rules behind them live in `hyperframes-core`):
You **can't** meaningfully run `hyperframes lint` / `check` here: they operate on the **assembled project** (the `index.html` graph / bundle), and your frame isn't wired in yet — so they report on _other_ files, not yours (a false green). The **orchestrator** runs them at **Step 6, after assembly** (the correct unit), and **re-dispatches you with the finding** if your frame fails (see **Retry** above). So get it right on write: re-read your file against this checklist before finishing — the codes in parens are `hyperframes lint`'s and what the orchestrator may cite back (the rules behind them live in `hyperframes-core`):
- `missing_template_wrapper` / `missing_composition_id` — root is `<template>`-wrapped and carries `data-composition-id="<frame_id>"`.
- **Template transport** — every `<style>` and `<script>` block, including the GSAP load, lives inside `<template>`.