hyperframes

ext/hyperframes

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/heygen-com/hyperframes.git synced 2026-09-05 00:56:23 +00:00

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
WaterrrForever	b9be0b2625	feat(skills,studio,media-use): the intent layer, review loop, and user memory — BRIEF.md, companion mode, recipes; /website-to-video folds into /product-launch-video (#2133 ) * feat(studio,cli): per-frame board comments, self-refreshing storyboard, status-aware preview landing Per-frame comment boxes on the storyboard board batch into .hyperframes/frame-comments.json (a resubmit wins per frame; unconsumed comments on other frames are kept). Submitted-but-unconsumed comments stay visible — a toolbar banner plus a per-tile echo — until the agent consumes the file; the banner also says what to do next (reply anything in the agent chat). The board keeps itself current: GET /projects/:id/signature exposes the watcher-cached project signature, the storyboard payload carries the signature it was derived from, and the view polls at 2s (hidden tabs skipped, re-checked on visibility), refetching in place with no loading flash. Posters bake the signature into their URL so tiles fill in as sketches land and a poster that failed mid-write retries on the next version; the empty state upgrades itself when STORYBOARD.md appears, and its handoff prompt now points the agent at the review loop and uses the parser's real status vocabulary (outline, not planned). preview lands the browser on the storyboard view while the board is the review surface — any frame built, or pure planning (srcs declared, none on disk yet) — and on the timeline once the video is assembled. * feat(skills): the review loop — plan, sketch, build as one shared process hyperframes-core/references/review-loop.md is the single source for the three-pass collaborative review: the plan proposed on a live board (§ 1), wireframe sketches marked built with one layout question (§ 2 — real words on plain blocks, run no CLI; a confirmed board is itself a valid deliverable when the user asked for a storyboard, not a video), the build dressing confirmed layouts (§ 3, worker or inline), and the final look (§ 4). Autonomous runs skip every gate and keep one question before render. The three narrative workflows' Steps 3/4/6 collapse to references plus their sketch stand-ins (captured-asset blocks for product-launch-video, plain code panels for pr-to-video); the confirmed-sketch handoff stays in each frame-worker prompt. general-video plans on a board for multi-scene narrative pieces in collaborative mode — its sketch pass is layout-before-animation with the user watching. The router treats "I want a storyboard" as a process request rather than a route, and closes exploratory intake by recommending a route plus how the run will review. The supporting contracts land next door: the comments channel (silent submit, one reply picks it up, check the file before the words) in brief-contract § 1; the sidecar schema and the built status rung in storyboard-format; the mode question asked first and alone in the three workflows' Step 0. * feat(media-use): user memory — remembered preferences and frozen recipes Two tiers of memory on media-use's existing two-tier storage split. Preferences (lightweight): confirmed brief answers — destination, aspect, language, mode, voice, style preset — recorded to the project's .media/preferences.json (committed, the team inherits it) and promoted to the personal ~/.media/preferences.json once the same value is confirmed in two different projects (a sightings ledger accumulates the cross-project evidence user-side, since project files can't see each other). prefs.mjs get/record; merge reads project-over-user; a changed value restarts its provenance. Recipes (heavyweight): one approved run frozen as a named, versioned bundle — frame.md, the storyboard skeleton (structure kept: durations, transitions, srcs, Video direction; statuses reset to outline; content blanked to per-frame fill-ins naming the beat's role), and the confirmed brief values. Named folders, not content hashes: re-freezing bumps version and archives <name>@v<N>; a freeze is already confirmed, so it promotes to the user tier immediately. recipe.mjs freeze/list/use, plus resolve --type recipe --entity <name> delegating like grade/lut. 16 new node --test cases; the media-use lib suite is 168/168. * feat(skills): wire user memory into the brief and the review loop brief-contract § 2 gains Remembered defaults: read the merged preferences before Round 2 and let a remembered value become the recommended option with a receipt naming its source project. Memory changes the default, never the question — every ask-marked field still gets asked, and what the request says this time beats what was picked last time. Record only what the user actually confirmed (a defaulted voice nobody chose is not an answer; a "go" that accepts the recommended defaults is). The first record announces itself once; after that the receipts carry the reminder. In autonomous mode a remembered value becomes the decided value, receipt included. The three narrative workflows read the remembered defaults before Round 2, record the confirmed answers at the Step 0 gate, record the chosen preset at the Step 2 gate (pr-to-video excepted — its preset is fixed), and fall back to the remembered voice when the request names none. general-video's discovery reads the same defaults. Recipes wire in at both ends: Step 0 checks for a matching recipe before the mode question — one question, plural-aware, and adopting one fills the brief, skips the design step, and drafts the storyboard from the frozen skeleton while every review gate still runs. The review loop's final look (§ 4) offers the freeze once after approval, and the confirmation teaches the recall phrase — the name is something the system reminds the user of, never something they must remember. The router recognizes a named recipe or "like last time" as a route. * docs(skills): the sketch pass names check, not the deprecated validate * feat(skills): intent-layer references — process, route briefs, capability menu, BRIEF.md format * feat(media-use): brief skeleton as the recipe's fourth artifact; flow/storyboard preference keys * feat(skills): the intent layer conducts every brief — workflows execute BRIEF.md * feat(skills): retire the mode preference key; sync catalog surfaces for intent layer * refactor(skills): dedupe router vs intent-layer guidance — one owner per rule * feat(skills): the design ask — own spec, pick by eye from showcases, or defer * docs(skills): the design ask says the honest line on capture routes * feat(skills): product-launch-video absorbs website-to-video as the tour angle * refactor(skills): keep product-launch-video pristine — a tour is brief intent, not a pipeline branch * feat(skills): production loop + genre lenses; general-video goes freeform (route yours, laws hold) * refactor(skills): /hyperframes is the front door - route tables and scope lists leave the workflows * docs(skills): review-loop pass across skill catalog * fix(cli): pass project dir to openStudioBrowser in background-server path * feat(skills): add pitch-round reference - verbalized sampling concept gate * feat(skills): wire pitch round into intent layer - completeness triage + route eligibility * feat(skills): editorial capability recommendations, handoff disciplines, menu-probe split * feat(skills): pitches carry their machinery; source-only-formed requests pitch the telling * feat(skills): companion goes director - ceiling treatment plus blueprint/rule citation discipline * fix(scripts): sandbox npx-leak guard - private npm global prefix keeps npx on the branch CLI * chore(skills): resync manifest hash after formatter pass reflowed general-video tables * fix(skills): recipe freeze reads workflow from BRIEF.md; style_preset records require workflow scope Two holes found by a live companion-run freeze: the agent-supplied --workflow contradicted the run's actual workflow (recipe.json said faceless-explainer, brief-skeleton said general-video), and the style_preset lookup missed because the preference had been recorded under the bare key. - freezeRecipe resolves the workflow from BRIEF.md frontmatter; the flag is a fallback for briefless projects and a contradicting flag is ignored (noted). - recordPreference refuses a bare style_preset — the scoped key is the only writable shape; freeze tolerates legacy bare records via read fallback. - review-loop § 4 / media-use SKILL / brief-format wording follow the machinery.	2026-07-15 21:19:14 +08:00
Miguel Ángel	de4e85add6	fix(skills): align core contract with check (#2218 )	2026-07-10 21:37:35 -04:00
WaterrrForever	17b852784b	feat(skills): mode-first briefs, value-first storyboards, and destination defaults across creation workflows (#2058 ) * feat(skills): add brief contract — interaction modes + shared intake fields across workflows New hyperframes-core/references/brief-contract.md, the shared intake contract every creation workflow now runs its brief against: - §1 interaction mode: collaborative (default) vs autonomous, ongoing vs one-time signals, mode set once and carried forward, and a gate taxonomy (preference / checkpoint / quality / routing) — autonomous skips waiting, never verification - §2 field registry: destination→aspect derivation (feed → 1:1, Shorts/TikTok → 9:16, else 16:9), message, angle, length, audience, language, narration — each workflow binds fields as ask or state - §3 question rules: one round with one question per asked field (native question UI mandatory when available, recommended option first with a receipt), never drop a question as inferable, and a mode legend advertised in the intro text instead of asked Wired into the surfaces: - hyperframes router: detect mode at entry, derive aspect from destination instead of stating 16:9 - product-launch-video / pr-to-video / faceless-explainer: ask/state binding tables at Step 0; Step 3/6 checkpoint-gate branches (autonomous posts a heads-up with a preview hint before render) - website-to-video: local mode definition now defers to the contract - music-to-video, general-video, embedded-captions, talking-head-recut, slideshow, motion-graphics: mode semantics wired per gate type - storyboard-format: new optional 'mode' frontmatter key - pr-to-video: length tier is a ceiling, not a floor — a one-headline PR recommends inside the 30–90s sweet spot regardless of diff size * feat(skills): story spine + mode-first brief across creation workflows Story — the reverse-iceberg feedback: - New hyperframes-creative/references/story-spine.md, three rules for the narrated workflows: the hook speaks the viewer's outcome language, the value claim lands by beat 2 (implementation is the footnote of the story, not the spine), and the storyboard is presented as a proposal — 'This video tells [audience] that [message]' plus a per-frame why: drawn from narrativeRole - pr-to-video: feature-reveal reordered promise-first (impact leads, diff/mechanism follow as evidence); hooks ban file/function names; fix-explainer, refactor-walkthrough, changelog unchanged - product-launch-video / faceless-explainer hook rules aligned to the spine; website-to-video's beat summary gains the echo line + why:; general-video points at the spine from its plan step Brief — hardened after live-test drift: - Mode is now the first question (Collaborative recommended vs Autonomous), its own round, skipped when the request carries a signal; autonomous asks nothing further until one final preview-or-render question before render - Step 0 rewritten as a literal two-round question script in each shot-sequence workflow (website-to-video's editorial register, channel-agnostic); brief-contract.md §3 reduced to invariants so the procedure lives in exactly one place * feat(skills): split type minimums by viewing context typography.md: full-screen viewing keeps body 20px / headline 60px; in-feed destinations (X / LinkedIn / Instagram — brief-contract's destination field) scale to body >=32px, headline >=90px, data labels >=24px. First-pass values, to be calibrated against real renders. * feat(skills): storyboard proposal as a table + credits close by default - story-spine § 3: the proposal presents frames as a markdown table (frame · beat · on screen · why) instead of dense paragraphs; the three shot-sequence workflows and website-to-video's beat summary reference the same shape - pr-to-video: the credits close is now the default ending — every PR video ends on a contributors frame (committers by commit count, 1-6 avatars), with no taste judgment; the only skip is when no avatar was fetched, and the user can cut the frame in the proposal * fix(skills): address review nits on the brief/story contracts - embedded-captions: the identity procedure now states both sides of the preference gate inline (user picks; autonomous picks with a stated why) - website-to-video step-2-brief: note that its mode section is the workflow's application of brief-contract.md, not a second definition - brief-contract: resuming a project reads mode from STORYBOARD.md frontmatter — a recorded mode counts as set, closing the write-only gap * docs(skills): add a non-code receipts example to the brief contract Review nit (jrusso1020, #2058): the receipts example in § 3 was PR-video-shaped only. A destination-shaped example joins it so the rule reads as workflow-neutral.	2026-07-09 01:58:51 +08:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

WaterrrForever

b9be0b2625

feat(skills,studio,media-use): the intent layer, review loop, and user memory — BRIEF.md, companion mode, recipes; /website-to-video folds into /product-launch-video (#2133 )

* feat(studio,cli): per-frame board comments, self-refreshing storyboard, status-aware preview landing

Per-frame comment boxes on the storyboard board batch into
.hyperframes/frame-comments.json (a resubmit wins per frame; unconsumed
comments on other frames are kept). Submitted-but-unconsumed comments
stay visible — a toolbar banner plus a per-tile echo — until the agent
consumes the file; the banner also says what to do next (reply anything
in the agent chat).

The board keeps itself current: GET /projects/:id/signature exposes the
watcher-cached project signature, the storyboard payload carries the
signature it was derived from, and the view polls at 2s (hidden tabs
skipped, re-checked on visibility), refetching in place with no loading
flash. Posters bake the signature into their URL so tiles fill in as
sketches land and a poster that failed mid-write retries on the next
version; the empty state upgrades itself when STORYBOARD.md appears,
and its handoff prompt now points the agent at the review loop and uses
the parser's real status vocabulary (outline, not planned).

preview lands the browser on the storyboard view while the board is the
review surface — any frame built, or pure planning (srcs declared, none
on disk yet) — and on the timeline once the video is assembled.

* feat(skills): the review loop — plan, sketch, build as one shared process

hyperframes-core/references/review-loop.md is the single source for the
three-pass collaborative review: the plan proposed on a live board
(§ 1), wireframe sketches marked built with one layout question (§ 2 —
real words on plain blocks, run no CLI; a confirmed board is itself a
valid deliverable when the user asked for a storyboard, not a video),
the build dressing confirmed layouts (§ 3, worker or inline), and the
final look (§ 4). Autonomous runs skip every gate and keep one question
before render.

The three narrative workflows' Steps 3/4/6 collapse to references plus
their sketch stand-ins (captured-asset blocks for product-launch-video,
plain code panels for pr-to-video); the confirmed-sketch handoff stays
in each frame-worker prompt. general-video plans on a board for
multi-scene narrative pieces in collaborative mode — its sketch pass is
layout-before-animation with the user watching. The router treats
"I want a storyboard" as a process request rather than a route, and
closes exploratory intake by recommending a route plus how the run will
review.

The supporting contracts land next door: the comments channel (silent
submit, one reply picks it up, check the file before the words) in
brief-contract § 1; the sidecar schema and the built status rung in
storyboard-format; the mode question asked first and alone in the three
workflows' Step 0.

* feat(media-use): user memory — remembered preferences and frozen recipes

Two tiers of memory on media-use's existing two-tier storage split.

Preferences (lightweight): confirmed brief answers — destination, aspect,
language, mode, voice, style preset — recorded to the project's
.media/preferences.json (committed, the team inherits it) and promoted
to the personal ~/.media/preferences.json once the same value is
confirmed in two different projects (a sightings ledger accumulates the
cross-project evidence user-side, since project files can't see each
other). prefs.mjs get/record; merge reads project-over-user; a changed
value restarts its provenance.

Recipes (heavyweight): one approved run frozen as a named, versioned
bundle — frame.md, the storyboard skeleton (structure kept: durations,
transitions, srcs, Video direction; statuses reset to outline; content
blanked to per-frame fill-ins naming the beat's role), and the confirmed
brief values. Named folders, not content hashes: re-freezing bumps
version and archives <name>@v<N>; a freeze is already confirmed, so it
promotes to the user tier immediately. recipe.mjs freeze/list/use, plus
resolve --type recipe --entity <name> delegating like grade/lut.

16 new node --test cases; the media-use lib suite is 168/168.

* feat(skills): wire user memory into the brief and the review loop

brief-contract § 2 gains Remembered defaults: read the merged
preferences before Round 2 and let a remembered value become the
recommended option with a receipt naming its source project. Memory
changes the default, never the question — every ask-marked field still
gets asked, and what the request says this time beats what was picked
last time. Record only what the user actually confirmed (a defaulted
voice nobody chose is not an answer; a "go" that accepts the
recommended defaults is). The first record announces itself once;
after that the receipts carry the reminder. In autonomous mode a
remembered value becomes the decided value, receipt included.

The three narrative workflows read the remembered defaults before
Round 2, record the confirmed answers at the Step 0 gate, record the
chosen preset at the Step 2 gate (pr-to-video excepted — its preset is
fixed), and fall back to the remembered voice when the request names
none. general-video's discovery reads the same defaults.

Recipes wire in at both ends: Step 0 checks for a matching recipe
before the mode question — one question, plural-aware, and adopting
one fills the brief, skips the design step, and drafts the storyboard
from the frozen skeleton while every review gate still runs. The
review loop's final look (§ 4) offers the freeze once after approval,
and the confirmation teaches the recall phrase — the name is something
the system reminds the user of, never something they must remember.
The router recognizes a named recipe or "like last time" as a route.

* docs(skills): the sketch pass names check, not the deprecated validate

* feat(skills): intent-layer references — process, route briefs, capability menu, BRIEF.md format

* feat(media-use): brief skeleton as the recipe's fourth artifact; flow/storyboard preference keys

* feat(skills): the intent layer conducts every brief — workflows execute BRIEF.md

* feat(skills): retire the mode preference key; sync catalog surfaces for intent layer

* refactor(skills): dedupe router vs intent-layer guidance — one owner per rule

* feat(skills): the design ask — own spec, pick by eye from showcases, or defer

* docs(skills): the design ask says the honest line on capture routes

* feat(skills): product-launch-video absorbs website-to-video as the tour angle

* refactor(skills): keep product-launch-video pristine — a tour is brief intent, not a pipeline branch

* feat(skills): production loop + genre lenses; general-video goes freeform (route yours, laws hold)

* refactor(skills): /hyperframes is the front door - route tables and scope lists leave the workflows

* docs(skills): review-loop pass across skill catalog

* fix(cli): pass project dir to openStudioBrowser in background-server path

* feat(skills): add pitch-round reference - verbalized sampling concept gate

* feat(skills): wire pitch round into intent layer - completeness triage + route eligibility

* feat(skills): editorial capability recommendations, handoff disciplines, menu-probe split

* feat(skills): pitches carry their machinery; source-only-formed requests pitch the telling

* feat(skills): companion goes director - ceiling treatment plus blueprint/rule citation discipline

* fix(scripts): sandbox npx-leak guard - private npm global prefix keeps npx on the branch CLI

* chore(skills): resync manifest hash after formatter pass reflowed general-video tables

* fix(skills): recipe freeze reads workflow from BRIEF.md; style_preset records require workflow scope

Two holes found by a live companion-run freeze: the agent-supplied --workflow
contradicted the run's actual workflow (recipe.json said faceless-explainer,
brief-skeleton said general-video), and the style_preset lookup missed because
the preference had been recorded under the bare key.

- freezeRecipe resolves the workflow from BRIEF.md frontmatter; the flag is a
  fallback for briefless projects and a contradicting flag is ignored (noted).
- recordPreference refuses a bare style_preset — the scoped key is the only
  writable shape; freeze tolerates legacy bare records via read fallback.
- review-loop § 4 / media-use SKILL / brief-format wording follow the machinery.

2026-07-15 21:19:14 +08:00

Miguel Ángel

de4e85add6

fix(skills): align core contract with check (#2218 )

2026-07-10 21:37:35 -04:00

WaterrrForever

17b852784b

feat(skills): mode-first briefs, value-first storyboards, and destination defaults across creation workflows (#2058 )

* feat(skills): add brief contract — interaction modes + shared intake fields across workflows

New hyperframes-core/references/brief-contract.md, the shared intake
contract every creation workflow now runs its brief against:

- §1 interaction mode: collaborative (default) vs autonomous, ongoing
  vs one-time signals, mode set once and carried forward, and a gate
  taxonomy (preference / checkpoint / quality / routing) — autonomous
  skips waiting, never verification
- §2 field registry: destination→aspect derivation (feed → 1:1,
  Shorts/TikTok → 9:16, else 16:9), message, angle, length, audience,
  language, narration — each workflow binds fields as ask or state
- §3 question rules: one round with one question per asked field
  (native question UI mandatory when available, recommended option
  first with a receipt), never drop a question as inferable, and a
  mode legend advertised in the intro text instead of asked

Wired into the surfaces:

- hyperframes router: detect mode at entry, derive aspect from
  destination instead of stating 16:9
- product-launch-video / pr-to-video / faceless-explainer: ask/state
  binding tables at Step 0; Step 3/6 checkpoint-gate branches
  (autonomous posts a heads-up with a preview hint before render)
- website-to-video: local mode definition now defers to the contract
- music-to-video, general-video, embedded-captions, talking-head-recut,
  slideshow, motion-graphics: mode semantics wired per gate type
- storyboard-format: new optional 'mode' frontmatter key
- pr-to-video: length tier is a ceiling, not a floor — a one-headline
  PR recommends inside the 30–90s sweet spot regardless of diff size

* feat(skills): story spine + mode-first brief across creation workflows

Story — the reverse-iceberg feedback:

- New hyperframes-creative/references/story-spine.md, three rules for
  the narrated workflows: the hook speaks the viewer's outcome
  language, the value claim lands by beat 2 (implementation is the
  footnote of the story, not the spine), and the storyboard is
  presented as a proposal — 'This video tells [audience] that
  [message]' plus a per-frame why: drawn from narrativeRole
- pr-to-video: feature-reveal reordered promise-first (impact leads,
  diff/mechanism follow as evidence); hooks ban file/function names;
  fix-explainer, refactor-walkthrough, changelog unchanged
- product-launch-video / faceless-explainer hook rules aligned to the
  spine; website-to-video's beat summary gains the echo line + why:;
  general-video points at the spine from its plan step

Brief — hardened after live-test drift:

- Mode is now the first question (Collaborative recommended vs
  Autonomous), its own round, skipped when the request carries a
  signal; autonomous asks nothing further until one final
  preview-or-render question before render
- Step 0 rewritten as a literal two-round question script in each
  shot-sequence workflow (website-to-video's editorial register,
  channel-agnostic); brief-contract.md §3 reduced to invariants so the
  procedure lives in exactly one place

* feat(skills): split type minimums by viewing context

typography.md: full-screen viewing keeps body 20px / headline 60px;
in-feed destinations (X / LinkedIn / Instagram — brief-contract's
destination field) scale to body >=32px, headline >=90px, data labels
>=24px. First-pass values, to be calibrated against real renders.

* feat(skills): storyboard proposal as a table + credits close by default

- story-spine § 3: the proposal presents frames as a markdown table
  (frame · beat · on screen · why) instead of dense paragraphs; the
  three shot-sequence workflows and website-to-video's beat summary
  reference the same shape
- pr-to-video: the credits close is now the default ending — every PR
  video ends on a contributors frame (committers by commit count, 1-6
  avatars), with no taste judgment; the only skip is when no avatar
  was fetched, and the user can cut the frame in the proposal

* fix(skills): address review nits on the brief/story contracts

- embedded-captions: the identity procedure now states both sides of the
  preference gate inline (user picks; autonomous picks with a stated why)
- website-to-video step-2-brief: note that its mode section is the
  workflow's application of brief-contract.md, not a second definition
- brief-contract: resuming a project reads mode from STORYBOARD.md
  frontmatter — a recorded mode counts as set, closing the write-only gap

* docs(skills): add a non-code receipts example to the brief contract

Review nit (jrusso1020, #2058): the receipts example in § 3 was
PR-video-shaped only. A destination-shaped example joins it so the rule
reads as workflow-neutral.

2026-07-09 01:58:51 +08:00