mirror of
https://github.com/heygen-com/hyperframes.git
synced 2026-08-31 18:56:42 +00:00
Hblee
9769ba2c7b
* feat(sdk): expose a paint query for transparent-composition hit-testing A host layering a transparent composition over other content has to know whether a point carries ink before it decides to swallow a click. The adapter only answered "what element is here", so AI Studio wrote its own answer and could not reach the per-pixel alpha the adapter already samples for <img>. Add PreviewAdapter.paintsAt, plus the pieces it is built from on a new ./adapters/iframe subpath so a host with different hit-test policy can compose its own walk. The walk is geometric rather than elementsFromPoint-based: that stack omits pointer-events:none nodes, and a decorative overlay carrying it still paints, so a z-stack query would report no ink over visible artwork — the direction that makes a composition vanish from under the cursor. fullBleedFraction is an option rather than a constant because "a layer covering the whole frame is background, not artwork" is host policy, not a fact about the composition. * fix(sdk): scope the full-bleed frame to the root under the point compositionFrameArea took the smallest [data-composition-id] in the whole document, so an unrelated sub-composition sized the reference frame for points nowhere near it: a 300x300 badge in a corner made every mid-size painter in a 1920x1080 outer frame read as full-bleed, and the composition went click-through under artwork the user can plainly see. That is the direction the fail-safe exists to avoid, and the docs already described the intended behaviour — the innermost root CONTAINING the point. Also read the alpha channel instead of matching known transparent spellings. Only the `transparent` keyword computes to rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); a faded-out white stays rgba(255, 255, 255, 0), which the set counted as painted. That erred toward absorbing clicks rather than losing them, so it was a false positive rather than a hazard, but it is wrong. Both are pinned by tests that fail when the fix is reverted. * fix(sdk): stop the paint query answering "no ink" over visible artwork Four cases where the walk landed on the wrong side of its own fail-safe. The full-bleed veto tested the winner's border-box area even when the alpha sampler had just read an opaque pixel there, so a full-frame transparent PNG or SVG overlay — the case this feature exists for — reported background over visibly opaque artwork, with no fullBleedFraction that worked. Ink now carries how it was established, and a measured pixel is never vetoed. An image whose pixels could NOT be read stays inferred, so a tainted CDN overlay still yields to the veto rather than absorbing every click. Composition roots were excluded from candidacy outright, so a root carrying a background answered false even at fraction 0, where the docs promise every painting box counts. Roots are candidates now; the veto discounts them without a special case, since a root's box is the frame. An <img> with a clear pixel early-returned past its own background, padding plate and border, which any other element would have counted. A same-origin iframe mid-navigation exposes a readable but empty document, so the !doc guard never fired and a loading composition answered a confident "no ink" — the exact failure the null convention exists to prevent. Also: the sort comparator's epsilon tie was intransitive, leaving the smallest-first guarantee (and the lazy single-sample property that rides on it) engine-dependent; the guide's pass-through recipe called a function that does not exist and hand-waved the coordinate mapping that makes it correct; and the reference now states the under-counts alongside the over-counts, the walk's blindness to runtime-mounted content, and compositionPaintsAt's preconditions. Each fix is pinned by a test that fails when the fix is reverted. * refactor(sdk)!: invert the paint query to isProvablyEmptyAt paintsAt handed callers three falsy bottom values with opposite safe readings: false meant "no ink, pass the click through", null meant "not knowable, treat as painted", and undefined from an adapter without the method also meant painted. The idiomatic `if (!preview.paintsAt?.(x, y)) passThrough()` therefore did the dangerous thing for two of the three, and the convention needed defending in the interface docstring, the reference and the guide — plus a dedicated comment and a pinning test on the headless adapter to stop null regressing to false. Inverting the polarity collapses the tri-state to a plain boolean and makes the safe reading structural: true only when the composition was readable and nothing painted there, so ink, an unreadable or still-loading document, and a missing implementation all land on "keep the composition clickable". The prose stays as rationale, but nothing depends on a reader remembering it. PaintsAtOptions becomes PaintQueryOptions, since it now describes the walk that both the adapter method and the exported compositionPaintsAt share rather than one method's arguments. compositionPaintsAt keeps its ink-positive name: it answers the other question, and its docstring points callers who need the fail-safe contract at the adapter. Nothing is released yet, so no consumer is on the old name.