Files
hyperframes/packages
James Russo 22363a11c9 perf(distributed): parallelize chunk capture across multiple workers (#906)
* perf(distributed): parallelize chunk capture across multiple workers

The distributed `renderChunk` primitive hardcoded `workerCount: 1` and
`captureStage` explicitly forbade `workerCount > 1` when `frameRange` was
set, with the comment:

  "Distributed chunk workers fan out at the activity layer; reduce
   workerCount to 1 when passing frameRange."

The assumption was that orchestration-layer fan-out (Temporal / Lambda /
K8s Jobs / SSH) saturates the available CPU on its own. In practice
adopters that deploy chunks onto multi-core hosts (8-24 vCPU is the
standard producer-worker pod sizing) end up pinning only ~3-4 cores per
chunk while the rest sit idle: chunk-level fan-out at the orchestration
layer gives each pod one chunk at a time, and the chunk render itself
was single-threaded.

Validated against a real 1080p / 30fps / 22-second shader-heavy
composition on a 22-vCPU Temporal pod: each chunk rendered at
165-273ms per frame (vs 94-98ms for the in-process streaming render
which runs `workerCount=2` by default). The slowest chunk gates total
wall-clock under parallel chunk fan-out, so the 2-3x per-frame gap
compounds and `distributed` was net-slower than `in-process` on every
composition smaller than ~5min of texture-class content. Lifting the
restriction is a measured ~2x per-chunk speedup with no contract
change at the framesDir or encoder layer.

Wire-up:

  * `WorkerTask.outputFrameOffset` — optional offset subtracted from the
    absolute frame index when computing the captured file's name.
    Default 0 (the in-process contract; file name == absolute index).
    Distributed chunks set this to the chunk's startFrame so file names
    land 0-indexed within the chunk's range, matching the sequential
    chunk-capture contract and the encoder's expectation that frames
    are read sequentially without an `-start_number` override.

  * `distributeFrames(totalFrames, workerCount, workDir, rangeStart=0)` —
    offsets both `startFrame`/`endFrame` (used for per-frame time math
    on the page's virtual clock) by `rangeStart`, and threads
    `outputFrameOffset = rangeStart` onto each task it emits. With the
    default `rangeStart=0` it is a no-op for in-process renders.

  * `executeWorkerTask` — uses `i - (task.outputFrameOffset ?? 0)` for
    the captured file name, leaving the per-frame TIME computation
    `(i * fps.den) / fps.num` untouched so the page's virtual clock is
    unchanged.

  * `executeDiskCaptureWithAdaptiveRetry({ frameRangeStart? })` — accepts
    the chunk's absolute startFrame and forwards it to `distributeFrames`
    and `buildMissingFrameRetryBatches`. Default `undefined` preserves
    the in-process contract.

  * `buildMissingFrameRetryBatches(ranges, ..., rangeStart=0)` —
    `findMissingFrameRanges` walks LOCAL 0-indexed file names; the retry
    batch translates the local missing-range pair back to ABSOLUTE
    composition indices for `WorkerTask.startFrame/endFrame` and sets
    `outputFrameOffset = rangeStart` so the retried capture writes back
    to the same local file name.

  * `captureStage` — drops the assert; passes
    `frameRangeStart: frameRange?.startFrame` to the parallel branch so
    workers land on absolute composition frame indices for time math
    while file names stay 0-indexed within the chunk range. Docstring
    updated to reflect that the parallel branch is now supported.

  * `renderChunk` — `workerCount: 1` → `workerCount: 2`. The pre-warmed
    `probeSession` is consumed only by the sequential branch; the
    parallel branch closes it during stage entry and creates its own
    worker sessions. Documented as a follow-up: skip probeSession
    creation when `workerCount > 1` to recover the ~3-5s warmup cost.

Backwards compatibility: every change is gated on a parameter that
defaults to the prior behavior. In-process callers (`executeRenderJob`)
pass no `frameRangeStart`, so `rangeStart === 0`, `outputFrameOffset`
defaults to 0, and the file-name math collapses to the prior `i` value.
The framesDir contract (`frame_0..frame_(totalFrames-1)`) and the
WorkerTask interface are extended, not replaced.

Tests: 24 pass / 0 fail across the distributed test suite (renderChunk,
plan, assemble, planFormatBanlist, planSizeCap, publicExports). 7 pass /
0 fail in `parallelCoordinator.test.ts`. The renderOrchestrator suite
has one pre-existing Windows-only failure
(`writeCompiledArtifacts — external assets on Windows drive-letter
paths`) unrelated to this change; the other 56 tests pass.

Refs: distributed-vs-inprocess benchmark thread at
heygen-com/experiment-framework#36950

* perf(distributed): auto-size chunk workerCount via calculateOptimalWorkers

Match the in-process renderer's worker selection instead of hardcoding 2.
`calculateOptimalWorkers(framesInChunk, undefined, cfg)` is the same call
`resolveRenderWorkerCount` makes under the hood, minus the capture-cost
calibration reduction (which would require plumbing the chunk's compiled
metadata through — left as a follow-up).

For a typical 22-vCPU producer-worker pod with `cfg.concurrency: "auto"`
this resolves to ~6 workers for a 240-frame chunk (capped by
`defaultSafeMaxWorkers() = max(6, min(16, floor(cpuCount/8)))`), matching
what `executeRenderJob` (the in-process path) already does. The prior
hardcoded `workerCount: 2` was a safe-minimum starting point that
undersized chunks vs prod's auto behavior.

Tests: 12/12 pass in `renderChunk.test.ts` (unchanged — the test suite
mocks the inner runCaptureStage call so workerCount selection is opaque
to it).

* refactor(distributed): /simplify pass on PR #906

Review pass on the parallel-capture frame-range change. Four targeted
cleanups identified by code-quality and efficiency review agents:

1. Add the missing `frameRange.endFrame - frameRange.startFrame === totalFrames`
   assert. The parallel branch forwards `totalFrames` separately from
   `frameRangeStart`; a caller passing mismatched values would have got a
   silently wrong distribution. The sequential branch already implicitly
   relied on this via its `rangeFrames = rangeEnd - rangeStart` arithmetic.

2. Collapse three near-duplicate docstrings (on `WorkerTask.outputFrameOffset`,
   `executeDiskCaptureWithAdaptiveRetry.frameRangeStart`, and `runCaptureStage`'s
   `frameRange`) so only the WorkerTask field carries the full contract. The
   other two cross-reference it.

3. Drop the WHAT-narrating comments inside `executeWorkerTask`'s per-frame
   loop. The variable names (`fileFrameIdx = i - outputOffset`) already say
   what the line does; the only remaining comment flags the non-obvious
   contract that the streaming callback gets the absolute index.

4. Trim the 30-line `chunkWorkerCount` block in `renderChunk` to one paragraph
   explaining the one non-obvious thing (why we use `calculateOptimalWorkers`
   directly instead of `resolveRenderWorkerCount`). The probeSession-wasted-on-
   parallel acknowledgement stays as a 3-line follow-up flag — investigated
   skipping it in this pass, but the SwiftShader probe is safety-critical and
   has no per-worker equivalent, so deferred to a separate change with proper
   per-worker assertion plumbing.

Tests + format + lint clean:
  * `bun test parallelCoordinator.test.ts` — 7/7
  * `bun test distributed/{renderChunk,plan}.test.ts` — 24/24
  * `bunx oxfmt` + `bunx oxlint` — clean
2026-05-16 16:29:34 -07:00
..
2026-05-16 13:02:23 -07:00
2026-05-16 13:02:23 -07:00
2026-05-16 13:02:23 -07:00
2026-05-16 13:02:23 -07:00
2026-05-16 13:02:23 -07:00