* feat(studio,cli): per-frame board comments, self-refreshing storyboard, status-aware preview landing Per-frame comment boxes on the storyboard board batch into .hyperframes/frame-comments.json (a resubmit wins per frame; unconsumed comments on other frames are kept). Submitted-but-unconsumed comments stay visible — a toolbar banner plus a per-tile echo — until the agent consumes the file; the banner also says what to do next (reply anything in the agent chat). The board keeps itself current: GET /projects/:id/signature exposes the watcher-cached project signature, the storyboard payload carries the signature it was derived from, and the view polls at 2s (hidden tabs skipped, re-checked on visibility), refetching in place with no loading flash. Posters bake the signature into their URL so tiles fill in as sketches land and a poster that failed mid-write retries on the next version; the empty state upgrades itself when STORYBOARD.md appears, and its handoff prompt now points the agent at the review loop and uses the parser's real status vocabulary (outline, not planned). preview lands the browser on the storyboard view while the board is the review surface — any frame built, or pure planning (srcs declared, none on disk yet) — and on the timeline once the video is assembled. * feat(skills): the review loop — plan, sketch, build as one shared process hyperframes-core/references/review-loop.md is the single source for the three-pass collaborative review: the plan proposed on a live board (§ 1), wireframe sketches marked built with one layout question (§ 2 — real words on plain blocks, run no CLI; a confirmed board is itself a valid deliverable when the user asked for a storyboard, not a video), the build dressing confirmed layouts (§ 3, worker or inline), and the final look (§ 4). Autonomous runs skip every gate and keep one question before render. The three narrative workflows' Steps 3/4/6 collapse to references plus their sketch stand-ins (captured-asset blocks for product-launch-video, plain code panels for pr-to-video); the confirmed-sketch handoff stays in each frame-worker prompt. general-video plans on a board for multi-scene narrative pieces in collaborative mode — its sketch pass is layout-before-animation with the user watching. The router treats "I want a storyboard" as a process request rather than a route, and closes exploratory intake by recommending a route plus how the run will review. The supporting contracts land next door: the comments channel (silent submit, one reply picks it up, check the file before the words) in brief-contract § 1; the sidecar schema and the built status rung in storyboard-format; the mode question asked first and alone in the three workflows' Step 0. * feat(media-use): user memory — remembered preferences and frozen recipes Two tiers of memory on media-use's existing two-tier storage split. Preferences (lightweight): confirmed brief answers — destination, aspect, language, mode, voice, style preset — recorded to the project's .media/preferences.json (committed, the team inherits it) and promoted to the personal ~/.media/preferences.json once the same value is confirmed in two different projects (a sightings ledger accumulates the cross-project evidence user-side, since project files can't see each other). prefs.mjs get/record; merge reads project-over-user; a changed value restarts its provenance. Recipes (heavyweight): one approved run frozen as a named, versioned bundle — frame.md, the storyboard skeleton (structure kept: durations, transitions, srcs, Video direction; statuses reset to outline; content blanked to per-frame fill-ins naming the beat's role), and the confirmed brief values. Named folders, not content hashes: re-freezing bumps version and archives <name>@v<N>; a freeze is already confirmed, so it promotes to the user tier immediately. recipe.mjs freeze/list/use, plus resolve --type recipe --entity <name> delegating like grade/lut. 16 new node --test cases; the media-use lib suite is 168/168. * feat(skills): wire user memory into the brief and the review loop brief-contract § 2 gains Remembered defaults: read the merged preferences before Round 2 and let a remembered value become the recommended option with a receipt naming its source project. Memory changes the default, never the question — every ask-marked field still gets asked, and what the request says this time beats what was picked last time. Record only what the user actually confirmed (a defaulted voice nobody chose is not an answer; a "go" that accepts the recommended defaults is). The first record announces itself once; after that the receipts carry the reminder. In autonomous mode a remembered value becomes the decided value, receipt included. The three narrative workflows read the remembered defaults before Round 2, record the confirmed answers at the Step 0 gate, record the chosen preset at the Step 2 gate (pr-to-video excepted — its preset is fixed), and fall back to the remembered voice when the request names none. general-video's discovery reads the same defaults. Recipes wire in at both ends: Step 0 checks for a matching recipe before the mode question — one question, plural-aware, and adopting one fills the brief, skips the design step, and drafts the storyboard from the frozen skeleton while every review gate still runs. The review loop's final look (§ 4) offers the freeze once after approval, and the confirmation teaches the recall phrase — the name is something the system reminds the user of, never something they must remember. The router recognizes a named recipe or "like last time" as a route. * docs(skills): the sketch pass names check, not the deprecated validate * feat(skills): intent-layer references — process, route briefs, capability menu, BRIEF.md format * feat(media-use): brief skeleton as the recipe's fourth artifact; flow/storyboard preference keys * feat(skills): the intent layer conducts every brief — workflows execute BRIEF.md * feat(skills): retire the mode preference key; sync catalog surfaces for intent layer * refactor(skills): dedupe router vs intent-layer guidance — one owner per rule * feat(skills): the design ask — own spec, pick by eye from showcases, or defer * docs(skills): the design ask says the honest line on capture routes * feat(skills): product-launch-video absorbs website-to-video as the tour angle * refactor(skills): keep product-launch-video pristine — a tour is brief intent, not a pipeline branch * feat(skills): production loop + genre lenses; general-video goes freeform (route yours, laws hold) * refactor(skills): /hyperframes is the front door - route tables and scope lists leave the workflows * docs(skills): review-loop pass across skill catalog * fix(cli): pass project dir to openStudioBrowser in background-server path * feat(skills): add pitch-round reference - verbalized sampling concept gate * feat(skills): wire pitch round into intent layer - completeness triage + route eligibility * feat(skills): editorial capability recommendations, handoff disciplines, menu-probe split * feat(skills): pitches carry their machinery; source-only-formed requests pitch the telling * feat(skills): companion goes director - ceiling treatment plus blueprint/rule citation discipline * fix(scripts): sandbox npx-leak guard - private npm global prefix keeps npx on the branch CLI * chore(skills): resync manifest hash after formatter pass reflowed general-video tables * fix(skills): recipe freeze reads workflow from BRIEF.md; style_preset records require workflow scope Two holes found by a live companion-run freeze: the agent-supplied --workflow contradicted the run's actual workflow (recipe.json said faceless-explainer, brief-skeleton said general-video), and the style_preset lookup missed because the preference had been recorded under the bare key. - freezeRecipe resolves the workflow from BRIEF.md frontmatter; the flag is a fallback for briefless projects and a contradicting flag is ignored (noted). - recordPreference refuses a bare style_preset — the scoped key is the only writable shape; freeze tolerates legacy bare records via read fallback. - review-loop § 4 / media-use SKILL / brief-format wording follow the machinery.
7.0 KiB
Brief format — BRIEF.md
Defines the intent document — the file a confirmed brief becomes. The questions that fill it live in the intent layer (/hyperframes § 4 + its references/route-briefs.md); the field semantics live in brief-contract.md § 2. This file defines only the artifact: its shape, its home, and its lifecycle.
BRIEF.md sits at the project root, and the project's files read as four layers: BRIEF.md (why, for whom, and everything the user asked for) → STORYBOARD.md (what, frame by frame) → frame.md (how it looks) → compositions/ (the thing itself).
Frontmatter — the confirmed fields
YAML block at the top: one key per deterministic field — the run's shape first, then the registry fields (brief-contract.md § 2) used by the route. Store canonical normalized values. Some values come directly from the user; others, such as workflow, aspect, and language, are routed, derived, or normalized and must use the vocabulary defined by the contract. Preserve the user's own wording in the body when it matters.
| Key | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
workflow |
the executing workflow (companion runs record general-video) |
faceless-explainer |
flow |
automation — the matched workflow's pipeline · companion — co-creation in /general-video |
automation |
storyboard |
yes — plan, sketches, and build reviewed on the live board (review-loop.md) · no — one shot from the confirmed brief |
yes |
message |
the ONE thing the video must communicate | "Ship it in an afternoon" |
destination / aspect / language / audience / length / angle … |
the registry fields this route confirmed | — |
Which keys are memory. Only the preference-backed subset — destination, aspect, language, flow, storyboard, voice, style_preset — is recorded with media-use → scripts/prefs.mjs record (the store rejects any other key). style_preset is stored per workflow: record it with --workflow <w> (the store refuses it bare — a look confirmed for one genre is not a default for the others). message, audience, length, angle live in the frontmatter only: they describe this video, not the user.
Body — the intent in prose
Four sections, each optional — write what the intent layer actually learned, omit what it didn't:
## Intent— a short paragraph: what the video is, for whom, why now; tone and feel in the user's own words.## Assets— the user's own material, one line each:path — what it is, where it belongs. Files named here are staged by the workflow, never re-discovered.## Customizations— capabilities the user opted into from the menu (/hyperframes→references/capability-menu.md) and any bespoke asks ("count-up on the revenue stat", "capture the pricing page too"), each with enough detail to act on.## Notes— everything true that fits no field: constraints, references, things to avoid.
Body prose is project-local — nothing in it enters cross-project memory. (Frozen recipes carry a blanked skeleton of it; a future prose-memory layer would extract from here, under its own approval rules.)
Lifecycle
- Created once, by the workflow's Setup, as its first action after
hyperframes init— never before (initrefuses a non-empty directory). The intent layer confirms the answers pre-project; Setup makes them durable, then records the preference-backed fields. Later confirmed changes update this same file. - It is the no-repeat token. A workflow that finds
BRIEF.mdreads it and asks no brief question. Itsworkflow:names the executor — a workflow that finds another's name there is in the wrong room: load that skill and hand over, don't re-route through the intent layer. NoBRIEF.mdbut the project exists (hyperframes.json/STORYBOARD.mdon disk) → a pre-BRIEF project: resume from the storyboard's frontmatter and the recorded preferences, optionally backfillingBRIEF.mdfrom what they already say — never re-interrogate a half-built project. - It stays the run's truth. A mid-run decision updates it as it happens: an explicit change to a frontmatter field ("make it 9:16 after all") rewrites the field and re-records the preference — a changed mind is a confirmed answer; an accepted capability, adopted material, or bespoke ask lands as one line in the matching body section. Resume reads this file, so write-back is what makes a dead session resumable — a decision that lives only in chat is a decision resume never sees.
- Execution mode derives; the storyboard's copy wins on resume.
flow×storyboardderive collaborative/autonomous checkpoint behavior (brief-contract.md§ 1). Persist the derived mode inSTORYBOARD.mdfrontmatter when that file exists. A mid-run mode-only switch updatesSTORYBOARD.md, not the already-confirmedfloworstoryboard; an explicit change to either run-shape field still updatesBRIEF.md. message/audiencelive here first.STORYBOARD.mdfrontmatter keeps its copies — the board and the parser read them — but when the two disagree,BRIEF.mdholds what the user confirmed.- Recipes carry its skeleton. Freezing a recipe (
review-loop.md§ 4) capturesbrief-skeleton.md— frontmatter structure kept, run-shape and content values blanked — so the next run starts pre-filled yet still confirms its own two run-shape answers.
Example
---
workflow: faceless-explainer
flow: automation
storyboard: yes
message: "Compound interest is a snowball, not a ladder"
destination: x-feed
aspect: 1080x1080
language: en
length: 60s
angle: concept
---
## Intent
Teach retail investors why starting early beats contributing more. Confident,
a little playful — closer to a bar-napkin sketch than a lecture.
## Assets
- public/growth-curve.png — the real 30-year S&P chart; the proof beat builds on it.
## Customizations
- Count-up on the final dollar figure.
## Notes
- No stock-photo aesthetics; keep it typographic.