Files
hyperframes/docs
Vance IngallsandClaude Opus 5 8fb1482e7f docs(prompting): rebuild rule 2 as cross-fade vs camera move
The old demo argued that a locked frame crops the story. The sharper claim is
what a cut throws away: a move carries the spatial relationship between two
shots, a cross-fade carries none.

Five stages each get their own colour and the halves diverge on how the next
colour arrives -- in place, or by travelling to it. 30-47% of pixels differ,
against 3% for every version where the WITHOUT half moved the content.

That 3% is the trap now documented in the rule: translating the scene and
translating the camera are the same transform, so sliding content past a fixed
frame is not a static comparison, it is the same shot rendered twice.

Embed is cache-busted to -v2; docs images carry immutable year-long cache, so
reusing the filename would serve returning visitors the old render.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 02:51:13 -07:00
..
2026-07-28 05:27:29 -07:00