Files
hyperframes/packages
Vance Ingalls b9321b7489 fix(engine): descend into repeating nested timelines for call() detection
Address PR #2093 review feedback (Miga, Rames D Jusso):

- The walker treated a repeating nested timeline (total > single) as an
  opaque interval and never descended into it, so a tl.call() living
  inside one would slip past hasTimelineCall detection entirely — the
  "any tl.call() disqualifies" claim wasn't quite literal. Now recurses
  for detection purposes even when the span is already opaque; the
  parent-level interval still dominates for frame-animated-marking, so
  this only widens what counts as "has a call()," never narrows the
  existing interval coverage.
- Restored the totalDuration() vs duration() rationale comment that got
  dropped when the tl.call() detection comment was added above it.
2026-07-08 21:19:22 -07:00
..
2026-07-08 16:21:05 -07:00
2026-07-08 16:21:05 -07:00
2026-07-08 16:21:05 -07:00
2026-07-08 16:21:05 -07:00
2026-07-08 16:21:05 -07:00
2026-07-08 16:21:05 -07:00
2026-07-08 16:21:05 -07:00
2026-06-16 13:16:09 -04:00
2026-07-08 16:21:05 -07:00
2026-07-08 16:21:05 -07:00