mirror of
https://github.com/heygen-com/hyperframes.git
synced 2026-09-03 12:54:29 +00:00
Two follow-ups to the ancestor-visibility skip in `injectVideoFramesBatch`
and `syncVideoFrameVisibility`.
1. **Mask defence.** Both ancestor-hidden branches previously wrote a plain
`img.style.visibility = "hidden"`. `applyDomLayerMask` writes the
stylesheet rule `#${showId} *{visibility:visible !important}`, and CSS
cascade puts important stylesheet author above non-important inline
author — so a sub-comp host landing in the active layer's `show` set
would revive a stale `__render_frame__` and let it bleed onto the
layer composite. Write the hide via
`style.setProperty("visibility", "hidden", "important")` instead;
important inline beats important stylesheet.
2. **Caller cache hygiene.** `createVideoFrameInjector` unconditionally
wrote `lastInjectedFrameByVideo.set(id, frameIndex)` after calling
`injectVideoFramesBatch`, even for videos the page silently skipped due
to a hidden visual ancestor. On the next call at the same frameIndex —
common with source-fps < output-fps, paused source frames, or
non-frame-aligned host starts — the cache short-circuited the second
inject and the host's first visible frame painted blank because the
replacement `<img>` was never created.
Make `injectVideoFramesBatch` return `string[]` (the subset of ids it
actually painted) and have the caller cache only those. The cli-side
`snapshot.ts` consumer is unaffected: its local `InjectFn` types the
return as `Promise<void>`, which is structurally compatible with
`Promise<string[]>` under TS void-return assignment rules.
Tests: linkedom doesn't preserve `!important` in cssText, so the two new
mask-defence cases spy on the live `<img>`'s `style.setProperty` and assert
the 3-arg call shape. The cache-hygiene case stubs the page-side primitives
via `vi.mock`, drives the hook twice at the same frameIndex with a stubbed
"injected nothing" first response, and verifies the second call still
issues an inject. A counter-test pins the happy-path cache hit so a future
refactor can't trade the skip bug for a never-cache regression.